Board paper: Accelerating systematic disclosure

Published Date: 
February, 2020
Editor: 
EITI International Secretariat

Board Paper 46-4-B for the Board's decision on establishing a pilot to accelerate systematic disclosures in EITI countries. The Board decided to adopt the Implementation Committees recommendations (decision 2020-07/BM-46

The Implementation Committee recommends that the Board reviews progress with encouraging systematic disclosure. The Implementation Committee has assessed the progress made in implementing the recommendations agreed in February 2018. The Committee’s main finding is that implementing countries have made limited progress with systematic disclosures.

Proposal for proportionate implementation: Seychelles

Published Date: 
September, 2019
Editor: 
EITI

Board Paper 45-4-B

Assessment of Seychelles' proposal for proportionate implementation for the reporting period 2019-2021.

The proposed approach reflects the limited size of Seychelles' extractive sector and national priorities. It would reduce implementation costs, while ensuring that EITI Principles are upheld. 

Assessment of the request for adapted implementation: Ukraine

Published Date: 
October, 2019

Board Paper 45-4-A 

Assessment of Ukraine's multi-stakeholder group’s request for adapted implementation with respect to the coverage of the extractive industries in the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine and Crimea for the reporting period 2018-2019.

The application was made because the GOvernment of Ukraine is not able to compel companies and local government agencies in tehse areas to participants in the EITI process. The government and the multi-stakeholder group have committed to ongoing efforts to ensure that EITI reporting is as comprehensive as possible. 

Assessment of the request for adapted implementation Iraq

Published Date: 
March, 2019
Editor: 
EITI International Secretariat

IC Paper 39-2-B

Assessment of Iraqi multi-stakeholder group’s request for adapted implementation with respect to the Kurdistan region for the reporting period 2016-2018.

The application was made because the Federal Government of Iraq is not able to compel companies and government agencies in the Kurdistan region to participate in the EITI process. The Federal Government and multi-stakeholder group have committee to ongoing efforts to ensure that EITI Reports are as comprehensive as possible.

Clarifying the application of the beneficial ownership requirements

Published Date: 
April, 2017
Editor: 
EITI International Secretariat

Board paper 37-6-A

This paper contains a recommendation from the Implementation Committee to the EITI Board for clarifying the interpretation of requirement 2.5.c. According to Requirement 2.5.c, the requirement for disclosing beneficial ownership applies to “corporate entity(ies) that bid for, operate or invest in extractive assets”. Implementation support and capacity building activities in 2016 has raised some questions with regards to the scope of companies affected by the beneficial ownership requirements and how to interpret provision 2.5.c.

Board Paper 39-4-D Request for adapted implementation Ukraine

Published Date: 
January, 2018
Editor: 
EITI International Secretariat

The Ukrainian multi-stakeholder group filed a request for adapted implementation with respect to coverage of extractive industries in the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine and Crimea.

The application was made because the Government of Ukraine is not able to compel companies and local government agencies in these areas to participate in the EITI process. The government and multi-stakeholder group have committed to ongoing efforts to ensure that EITI Reports are as comprehensive as possible.

The Board approved the request (2018-10/BM-39)

Inquiry from EITI Germany regarding requirement 4.1 and 4.6

Published Date: 
May, 2018
Editor: 
EITI

On 3 May 2018, the EITI Chair received a request (see Annex 1) for clarification on requirements 4.1 and 4.6 from EITI Germany (D-EITI). The request relates to whether a materiality threshold of €2 million for local business taxes is in line with the EITI requirements 4.1 and 4.6.

This Board paper lays out the analysis and recommendation of the implementation committee to the Board.

The EITI Board confirmed that the proposal was is in line with the EITI requirements 4.1 and 4.6 of the EITI Standard (decision 2018-31/BM-40

Board paper 35-4-F: Assessment of the Request for adapted implementation: Ukraine

Published Date: 
September, 2016
Editor: 
EITI International Secretariat

The Ukrainian multi-stakeholder group’s tabled a request for adapted implementation with respect to coverage of extractive industries in the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine and Crimea. The application was made because the Government of Ukraine is not able to compel companies and local government agencies in these areas to participate in the EITI process. The government and multi-stakeholder group have committed to ongoing efforts to ensure that EITI Reports are as comprehensive as possible.

Assessment of the request for adapted implementation of São Tomé and Príncipe

Published Date: 
February, 2019
Editor: 
EITI International Secretariat

IC Paper 39-2-A, 27 March 2019

Submitted by: EITI International Secretariat on: 20 March 2019

The Secretariat recommends that the Implementation Committee recommends that the Board accepts the São Tomé and Príncipe (STP) EITI National Committee’s request for adapted implementation with respect to reconciliation of revenues and disclosure of contextual information related to the Nigeria- São Tomé and Príncipe Joint Development Zone (JDZ).

Pages